
Introduction
Concerns about
water
safety
Children
and
contaminated
water
Pregnancy and
drinking water
contaminants

Introduction
Materials
dissolved
in
water
- Inorganics
- Organics
Materials
suspended in
water
- Pathogens
- Asbestos
Interview
excerpt

Drinking water
sources
Municipal
providers
Private wells
Location of
home
Chlorination
and
DBPs
High
risk
populations
Home age & lead
Use Sensory
clues to identify
contaminants

Importance of
product
certification
Things
to consider
Water
treatment
methods, POU
- Boiling
- Distillation
- Reverse
Osmosis (RO)
- Filtration
* Sediment
* Activated
carbon
GAC
Solid block
* Pore
size
- Bottled water
- Ultraviolet (UV)
- Water softeners
- KDF
- Ion exchange
- 'Altered'
water
Comparison
of
drinking
water
treatment methods
Comparison
of
long-term costs
for water
treatment
Emergency
Water Treatment
Four
Steps to
determining the
best
water
treatment
method
(new 2/05)
Recommendations
Questions
Comments
and
suggestions
Refer
this site
to friends
About Me
Over 300 links to
drinking water
related sites
Terrorism
and
Drinking Water
(updated 1/1/05)
|
|
Four
steps to help you select the best
water treatment solution for your
situation
My recommendation
for a high-quality
water purification system
|
|
The importance of independent
certification for product evaluation - Truth in
advertising:
There are many thousands
products on the market that claim to provide you, the consumer, with purest
water available, everything from filtration systems and distillation units to
bottled water. There are, for instance, over 2,500 different water filters
on the market.
How do you evaluate competing, often
contradictory, statements and determine which claims are accurate and which
advertisements are nothing more than creative writing. When purchasing
health related products, creative advertising can be expensive for the
consumer, not to
mention downright dangerous. An improperly maintained water filter can
actually incubate trapped bacteria and release them into the "filtered" water.
I personally believe that a product's performance as well as the
accuracy of its advertising literature should be tested and certified by an
independent and disinterested third party. If a product is certified by a
reputable company you can be assured that a product's ads are not misleading and
the product will perform as specified.
Two organizations provide independent certification for water purification
devices, NSF
International and the Water
Quality Association (WQA). Underwriters
Laboratories (UL) is also beginning to certify water treatment systems.
The WQA has developed a Gold Seal program to help consumers choose quality water
treatment products. The WQA tests prototype water
treatment equipment, and awards the Gold Seal only to those systems
that have met or exceeded industry standards for contaminant reduction
performance, structural integrity, and materials safety.
NSF International is a group
that certifies water treatment systems, distillation units, bottled water, water
softeners, and a number of other food preparation systems. NSF
certification means that not only do the products perform as tested, the product
advertisements are also evaluated for accuracy and truthfulness. Products
are tested on an ongoing basis to make certain that companies continue to
produce products that perform as advertised.
You need to be aware
that there are a number of different NSF standards and different levels of
compliance within the standards. NSF certification does not mean
much unless you know exactly what a specific certification standard stands
for. A water filter certified to meet NSF Standard 42 Class II for taste,
odor and chlorine and Class II for particulate matter is not equivalent to a
filter certified to meet NSF Standard 42 Class I for taste, odor and chlorine
and Class I for particulate matter and Standard No. 53 for Health Effects.
The latter filter will remove a far wider range of contaminants -- and
will also probably cost 10 times as much as the former.
You will also
find, if you research water purification devices or bottled water, that many
companies state on their literature "Tested to NSF standards".
Tested by who? How often? Who backs up that claim? I
just visited a web site that advertised their water filter as tested and
certified in accordance with NSF/ANSI standards 42 and 53 (the NSF
logo was even displayed). I then checked the NSF on-line site
and neither the company nor the filter was listed as certified.
Check out the NSF site below, and use them as one of your guides to selecting a reliable
product. The site has on-line comparisons of many of the products they certify.
|
NSF
International Mission statement - Behind the NSF Mark is an
independent, not-for-profit organization called NSF International. For over 50
years NSF has been committed to public health safety and protection of the
environment by developing standards, by providing education and by providing
third-party conformity assessment services while representing the interest of
all stakeholders. This site provides an on-line comparison of water filtration
units that are certified by NSF.
You may select "Drinking Water
Treatment Units" and/or "Bottled
Water and Packaged Ice". The NSF Standards that
pertain to water filters are # 42 and # 53. To use the guide, for water
treatment units, either enter a company name you are interested in
investigating or scroll to the bottom of the page and select either the
product type (counter top filter, under counter filter, etc.) or the
product standard (42, 44, 53, etc.).
You can look up certified bottled water by brand name, product
type, etc.
NSF
Drinking Water Standards
There are currently six ANSI/NSF standards relating to water
filtration and treatment devices, each one designed for a specific type
of product.
STANDARD 42: Drinking Water Treatment Devices - Aesthetic Effects
STANDARD 44: Cation Exchange Water Softeners
STANDARD 53: Drinking Water Treatment Devices - Health Effects
STANDARD 55: Ultraviolet Microbiological Water Treatment Systems
STANDARD 58: Reverse Osmosis Drinking Water Treatment Systems
STANDARD 62: Drinking Water Distillation Systems |
|
Things to Consider when Selecting
a Purification
Solution:
The list of water purification solutions
below is designed for people who would like to have protection at home or work
from actual or potential contaminants in the water they drink.
In order to determine which of the solutions is best for your needs you might
want to consider the following:
How much
purified water you would like to use per day for drinking and cooking (a family
of four will probably use 4 to 8 gallons per day).
Which
contaminants are actually in your water (and which ones might occasionally show
up). The only way to know this for sure is to request a report from your water
supplier or have your water tested.
Which
contaminants you are interested in removing (the information on the other pages
of this site should help). The plan I adopted was to go with a solution that
would provide the best protection from most of the potential contaminants (for
the lowest cost and least maintenance) - even
though most of the contaminants are not currently present in my tap water.
The cost of
the solution you decide upon, both the initial cost (which may be high
for some filtration systems, ion exchange units, distillers, etc.) and the
ongoing costs (which might be high for distillers, bottled water, etc.).
Look at the total amount you will spend over the next 10 to 40 years based
on the amount of pure water you would like to be able to use for drinking,
cooking, washing foods, etc.).
The value of
the product. Is the product certified to perform as advertised (or in the case
of bottled water, is it certified to be free of contaminants). Does the product
provide you with safe, good tasting water at a reasonable cost. Is there
minimal maintenance required.
|
Water
Treatment Methods for
Domestic Use:
Most of the methods of water treatment methods discussed below
are Point Of Use (POU) devices. POU methods treat water at the point where
is is used - frequently at the kitchen sink. Only the water that is
actually used for drinking, cooking, beverage preparation, etc. is
treated. This has the advantage of economy - only a few hundred gallons of
water need to be treated per year instead of many thousands if all of the water
entering the home were to be treated.
Most people who use water supplied by a
municipal water company only need to worry about POU treatment, because it
is your water company's responsibility to provide biologically and chemically
safe water that has most objectionable taste and odor causing substances
removed. As you have read elsewhere on my site and in the local news, this
is unfortunately not always the case. Most people using public water do not need to employ
Point of Entry treatment devices or the more expensive POU devices like distillation and reverse osmosis. It
is important, though, to obtain and read the annual Water Quality Report that the water
company is required to make available to you. The contaminants most people
using public water would be liable to experience at harmful or unacceptable
levels are:
-
Residual disinfectants (chlorine and/or
chloramine, for example) added to keep water safe during distribution.
-
Disinfection byproducts, like the
trihalomethanes.
-
Lead (as discussed elsewhere, many
homes leach lead into the water from pipes and/or fixtures).
-
Brief, accidental contamination by
microbes (E. coli, giardia, cryptosporidia, etc.) or other contaminants.
-
If you live in an agricultural region,
unacceptable levels of nitrates or organic compounds (even if they are
below regulated levels).
|
Point Of Entry (POE), or whole house water treatment (where all water entering
the home is treated) is indicated when the water has problems that affect all
areas of the home. The most common example is a water softening ion
exchange system that removes calcium and magnesium ions (and some other ions)
from the water. Hard water, while quite healthy to drink, can cause scale
buildup in pipes and on fixtures, interfere with the effectiveness of soap, and shorten
the life of appliances, like dish washers and hot water heaters. Other POE water treatment
systems are designed to remove iron and manganese, adjust pH levels, add
chlorine or other disinfectant, etc. People using water from a private
well, spring, or surface source are most likely to require POE treatment.
Check the Water Treatment Table for some POE
methods of treatment (particularly the notes toward the bottom). A high quality POU
treatment system should also be considered if you have a well or use water from
a spring or surface source, because each type of POE treatment generally removes
only one contaminant type (the one or two POE treatment methods someone might
use would only remove
the most obvious, annoying, or dangerous contaminant(s)). Other
contaminants that might be present like lead (from the home's plumbing and
pipes) and chlorine residue (if the water is disinfected) would best be removed
by a POU device.
Treatment Methods:
Boiling:
In an emergency, boiling
is the best way to purify water that is unsafe because of the presence
of protozoan parasites or bacteria.
If the water is cloudy, it should be
filtered before boiling. Filters designed for use when camping,
coffee filters, towels (paper or cotton), cheesecloth, or a cotton plug
in a funnel are effective ways to filter cloudy water.
Place the water in a clean container and bring it
to a full boil and continue boiling for at least 3 minutes (covering the
container will help reduce evaporation). If you are more than
5,000 feet above sea level, you must increase the boiling time to at
least 5 minutes (plus about a minute for every additional 1,000 feet).
Boiled water should be kept covered while cooling. From Drinking
Water for Emergency Use (pdf file). You can also look at recommendations
of the EPA.
The advantages of Boiling Water include:
Pathogens
that might be lurking in your water will be killed if the water is boiled
long enough.
Boiling
will also drive out some of the Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) that
might also be in the water.
This method works well to make water that is
contaminated
with living organisms safe to drink, but because of the
inconvenience, boiling is
not routinely used to purify drinking water except
in emergencies.
The disadvantages of Boiling Water include:
Boiling
should not be used when toxic metals, chemicals (lead, mercury, asbestos,
pesticides, solvents,
etc.), or nitrates have contaminated the water.
Boiling may concentrate any harmful
contaminants that do not vaporize as the
relatively pure water vapor boils
off.
Energy is needed to boil the water
|
Distillation:
In
many ways, distillation
is the reverse of boiling. To remove impurities from water by distillation, the
water is usually boiled in a chamber causing water to vaporize, and the pure (or mostly pure) steam
leaves the
non volatile contaminants behind. The steam moves to a different part of the
unit and is cooled until it condenses back into liquid water. The resulting distillate drips into a
storage container.
Salts, sediment, metals -
anything that won't boil or evaporate - remain in the distiller and must be
removed. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are a good example of a contaminant that
will evaporate and condense with the water vapor. A vapor trap, carbon filter, or other device must be used
along with a distiller to ensure
the more complete removal of contaminants.
The advantages of Distillation include:
A good
distillation unit
produces very pure water. This is one of
the few practical ways to remove nitrates,
chloride, and other salts that carbon
filtration can not remove.
Distillation also
removes pathogens in the
water, mostly by killing and leaving them
behind when the water vapor evaporates.
If the water is boiled, or heated just short
of boiling, pathogens would also be killed.
As
long as the distiller is kept clean and is
working properly the high quality of treated
water will be very consistent regardless of
the incoming water - no drop in quality
over
time.
No
filter cartridges to replace, unless a carbon filter is used to remove volatile
organic compounds.
The disadvantages of Distillation include:
Distillation takes time to purify the water,
It can take two to five hours to make a
gallon of distilled water.
Distillers uses electricity all the time the unit is operating
Distillers requires periodic cleaning of the boiler, condensation compartment, and
storage
tank.
Countertop Distillation is one of the more expensive home water treatment
methods, using $0.25 to $0.35 of electrical energy per gallon of distilled water
produced -
depending on local electricity costs. The
cost of ownership is high
because you not only have the initial cost of the
distillation unit to consider, but you
also must pay for the electrical energy
for each gallon of water produced. If it cost
you $0.25 to distill each gallon,
and you purified 10 gallons per week, you would
pay $130 for your 520 gallons of
distilled water each year.
Most home distillation units require electricity, and will
not function in an
emergency situation when electrical
power is not available.
You might want to check NSF
International to see if the distillation system you are interested
in purchasing is certified.
I have had a number of questions asking if
distilled water (or water with most of the ions removed by reverse
osmosis or deionization) are either bad for a person's health or
beneficial for health relative to purified water that still contains
ions (usually calcium and magnesium). Click here
to view my
response to that question.
|
Reverse Osmosis (RO):
Water
pressure is used to force water molecules through a membrane that has extremely tiny
pores, leaving the larger contaminants behind. Purified water is collected from the "clean" side of the
membrane, and water containing the concentrated contaminants is flushed down the
drain from the "contaminated" side. The average RO system is a unit consisting of a
sediment/chlorine pre filter, the reverse-osmosis membrane, a water storage tank, and
an activated-carbon post filter. They cost from about $150 to over $1,500
for point of use systems.
The advantages of Reverse Osmosis include:
Reverse
osmosis significantly reduces salt, most other inorganic material
present
in the water, and some organic compounds.
With a quality carbon filter to remove
any organic materials that get through the
filter, the purity of the treated water
approaches that produced by distillation.
Microscopic parasites (including viruses) are usually removed by properly
functioning RO units, but
any defect in the membrane would allow these
organisms to flow undetected
into the
"filtered" water - they are not
recommended for use on
biologically unsafe water.
Though
slower than a carbon or sediment water filter, RO systems can typically
purify more water per day
than distillers and are less expensive to operate and
maintain.
Reverse Osmosis systems also do not use electricity, although because
they
require relatively high water pressure to
operate, they may not work well in some
emergency situations.
The disadvantages of Reverse Osmosis include:
Point
of Use RO units make only a few gallons of treated water a day for drinking
or cooking.
RO systems
waste water. Two to four gallons of "waste" water are flushed down
the drain for
each gallon of filtered water produced.
Some pesticides, solvents and other volatile organic chemicals
(VOCs) are not
completely removed by RO.
A good activated carbon post filter is
recommended
to reduce these contaminants.
Many conditions affect the RO membrane's efficiency in reducing the amount of
contaminant in the water.
These include the contaminant concentration, chemical
properties of the contaminants, the membrane type and condition, and
operating conditions (like pH, water
temperature, and water pressure).
Although RO filters do not use electricity, they depend on a relatively high water
pressure to force the
water molecules through the membrane. In an emergency
situation where water pressure has been lost, these systems
will not function.
* However, if a high quality activated carbon
filter is used for the post filter, it could
probably be disconnected and
used to siphon water through in an emergency to
reduce
many contaminants.
RO systems require maintenance. The pre and post
filters and the reverse
osmosis membranes must be
changed according to the manufacturer's
recommendation,
and the storage tank must be cleaned periodically.
Damaged
membranes are not easily detected, so it is hard to tell if the system is
functioning normally
and safely.
You might want to check NSF
International to see if the Reverse Osmosis system you are
interested in purchasing is certified.
A reverse-osmosis system is a good treatment
option for people who have
unacceptably high levels of dissolved inorganic
contaminants in their drinking
water which can not be removed effectively or
economically by other methods.
Water from shallow wells in agricultural areas
that contains high nitrate levels is
a good example of a situation where RO would make sense. Most people,
however, who are using municipal water water that is subject to
EPA regulations
usually have acceptably low levels of nitrates. Maximum nitrate
levels should be
able to be determined by requesting a water quality report from
your local water
provider.
I have had a number of questions asking if
distilled water are either bad for a person's health or
beneficial for health relative to purified water that still contains
ions (usually calcium and magnesium). This question pertains
equally well to water from a RO system., because most ions have been
removed by the treatment. Click here
to view my
response to that question.
|
Water Filters:
The topic of water filters is complicated because there are so many
models available (over 2,500 different models manufactured by more than
500 companies), and because there are so many types of filtration
strategies and combinations of strategies used. The basic concept behind
nearly all filters, however, is fairly simple. The contaminants are
physically prevented from moving through the filter either by screening
them out with very small pores and/or, in the case of carbon filters, by
trapping them within the filter matrix by attracting them to the surface
of carbon particles (the process of adsorption).
There are two main types of filters (sediment
and activated carbon), and
sometimes they are combined into a single unit.
A third type, which will be
considered as a separate topic, is reverse osmosis.
You will read about micron or sub micron
filtration. This is a measure of how good
the filter is at removing particles from the water -
smaller is better. A micron is a
unit of measure - one micron is about 1/100 the
diameter of a human hair. A
filter that removes particles down to 5 microns will
produce fairly clean-looking
water, but most of the water parasites, bacteria,
cryptosporidia, giardia, etc. will
pass through the pores. A filter must trap particles
one micron or smaller to be
effective at removing cryptosporidia or giardia
cysts. Viruses can not be effectively
removed by any filtration method. In theory,
reverse osmosis will remove viruses,
but a small flaw in the membranes would allow viruses
to pass undetected
into the 'filtered' water.
Click
here
too view a figure that compares the relative size of several biological
contaminants with the pore size of some common
filters.
A benefit of all home filtration systems is that they
are passive. That is, they
require no electricity to filter the water, and
normal home water pressure is used
to force the water though the filter. The only
routine maintenance required is
periodic replacement of the filtration element.
As long as the cost of the
replacement filter elements is reasonable,
owning a even a high-end water filter
can be very inexpensive if you look at the long
term costs and compare it
with other solutions.
 |
Sediment Filters - Solid Particles are
Strained Out of the Water:
Fiber Filters: These filters contain cellulose, rayon or some
other
material spun into a mesh with small pores. If you take
a piece of cloth and
pour water containing sand through it
you will get the picture. Suspended
sediment (or turbidity) is
removed as water pressure forces water through
tightly
wrapped fibers. Some small organic particles that cause
disagreeable odors and taste
may also be removed. These
filters come in a variety of sizes and meshes
from fine to
coarse, with the lower micron rating being the finer. The finer
the filter, the more particles are trapped and the more often
the filter
must be changed.
Fiber filters are often used as pre-filters to reduce the
suspended contaminants that could clog carbon
or RO filters.
Fiber filters will not remove contaminants that are
dissolved
in the water, like chlorine, lead, mercury, trihalomethanes or
other organic
compounds.
Ceramic Filters: Ceramic filters are much like fiber filters
and use a
process where water is forced through the pores
of a ceramic filtration
media. This provides mechanical
filtration only. This type of filter can
reduce asbestos
fibers,cysts (if the pores are one micron or smaller), some
bacteria (with pore sizes in the 0.2 - 0.8 micron range**) and
other
particulate matter.
Ceramic filters will not remove contaminants that are
dissolved in the water, like chlorine, lead, mercury,
trihalomethanes or other organic
compounds, nor will they
remove viruses. These filters may be used as a back-end to
an activated carbon
filter to provide a more thorough removal
of contaminants.
**
NOTE - NSF does not certify filters for bacterial removal, and I am
unaware of any independent certification process for their removal.
|
 |
Activated Carbon
Filters:
Activated carbon (AC) is particles of carbon that have been
treated to increase their surface area and increase their ability to adsorb a
wide range of contaminants - activated carbon is particularly good at adsorbing organic compounds. You will find two basic kinds of carbon filters Granular
Activated Carbon (GAC) and Solid Block Activated Carbon (SBAC).
Contaminant reduction in AC filters takes
place by two processes, physical removal of contaminant
particles, blocking any that are too large to pass through the
pores (obviously, filters with smaller pores are more effective),
and a process called adsorption by which a variety of
dissolved contaminants are attracted to and held
(adsorbed) on the surface of the carbon particles. The
characteristics of the carbon material (particle and pore size,
surface area, surface chemistry, density, and hardness) influence
the efficiency of adsorption.
AC is a highly porous material; therefore, it has an
extremely high surface area for contaminant adsorption. One reference mentions
" The equivalent
surface area of 1 pound of AC ranges from 60 to 150 acres (over 3
football fields)". Another article states, "Under
a scanning electron microscope the activated carbon looks like a porous
bath sponge. This high
concentration of pores within a relatively small volume produces a
material with a phenomenal surface area: one tea spoon of activated
carbon would exhibit a surface area equivalent to that of a football
field." ( estimates of surface area vary from different
sources - RJ)
AC is made of tiny clusters of carbon atoms stacked upon one another.
The carbon source is a variety of materials, such as peanut shells,
coconut husks, or
coal. The raw carbon source is slowly heated in the absence of air to
produce a high carbon material. The carbon is activated by passing
oxidizing gases through the material at extremely high temperatures. The
activation process produces the pores that result in such high
adsorptive properties. An article about Activated
Carbon states that "Activated carbon is one of the best
tools which can be used to reduce risks to human health and provide an
aesthetically pleasing product at reasonable cost."
The article also describes how AC works and has some of the best scanning electron microscope
pictures of actual AC granules I have seen.
The adsorption process depends on the following factors: 1) physical
properties of the AC, such as pore size distribution and surface area;
2) the chemical nature of the carbon source, or the amount of oxygen and
hydrogen associated with it; 3) chemical composition and concentration
of the contaminant; 4) the temperature and pH of the water; and 5) the
flow rate or time exposure of water to AC. Interesting
article:
What is Activated Carbon, Adsorption,
History
of AC.
The effectiveness of carbon filters to reduce contaminants is affected
by the factors affecting adsorption
listed above and three additional
characteristics of the
filter, contact time between the water and the carbon
material, the amount of carbon in the filter, and pore size.
The length of contact time between the water and the carbon material,
governed by the rate of water
flow and the amount/volume of activated
carbon, has a significant effect on adsorption of contaminants. More contact
time results in greater adsorption.
The
amount of carbon present in a cartridge or filter affects the amount
and type of contaminant removed. Less carbon is required to remove taste-
and odor-producing chemicals than to remove
trihalomethanes.
Pore size characteristics will be discussed in greater detail on
the GAC
and SBAC pages, but GAC filters contain loose granules of
activated
carbon while in SBAC filters, the activated carbon is in the
form of very
small particles bound into a solid, matrix with very small
pores.
Because of the filter characteristics discussed above, the most
effective
Point of Use activated carbon filters are
large SBAC filtration
systems, and the least effective
are the small, pour-through pitcher filters.
Activated carbon filter cartridges will, over time, become less
effective at
reducing contaminants as the pores clog with
particles (slowing water flow)
and the adsorptive surfaces in the pores become
filled with contaminants
(typically not affecting flow rate). There
is often no noticeable indication
that a carbon filter is no longer removing
contaminants, so it is
important to replace the cartridge according to
the manufacturer's
instructions.
The overall water quality (turbidity or presence of other
contaminants) also affects the capacity of
activated carbon to adsorb a
specific contaminant.
It is important to note, particularly when using counter-top and
faucet-mount
carbon filtration systems, that hot
water should NEVER be run through
a carbon filter. I have seen warnings
about possible damage to the filter
from hot water. Perhaps more importantly, hot
water will tend to release
trapped contaminants into the water flow
potentially making the water
coming out of the filter more contaminated than
the water going in.
Granular Activated Carbon (GAC):
In this type of filter, water flows through a bed of
loose activated carbon
granules which trap some particulate matter and
remove some
chlorine,
organic contaminants, and undesirable tastes and odors. The three main
problems associated with GAC
filters are: channeling,
dumping, and
an inherently large pore size.
Most of the disadvantages discussed
below are not the fault of the
activated carbon filtration media, rather, the
problem is the design of
the filters and the use of loose granules of
activated carbon.
The advantages of GAC filters include:
Simple
GAC filters are primarily used for aesthetic water treatment,
since they
can reduce
chlorine and particulate matter as well as improve
the taste and odor of the
water.
Loose
granules of carbon do not restrict the water flow to the extent of
Solid Block Activated Carbon (SBAC)
filters. This enables them to
be used in situations, like whole
house filters, where maintaining a good
water flow rate and
pressure is important.
Simple, economical maintenance. Typically an inexpensivefilter
cartridge needs to be changed
every few months to a year, depending
on water use and the
manufacturer's recommendation.
GAC filters do not require electricity, nor do they waste water.
Many dissolved minerals are not removed by activated carbon. In the
case of calcium,
magnesium, potassium, and other beneficial minerals,
the taste of the water can be
improved and some (usually small) nutrient
value can be
gained from the water.
The bottom line is that GAC filters are effective and valuable water
treatment devices, but their limitations always need to be
considered. A uniform flow rate, not to exceed the manufacture's
specifications, needs to be maintained for optimal performance, and the
filter cartridge must be changed after treating the number of gallons
the filter is rated for.
The disadvantages of GAC filters include:
Water flowing through the filter is able to
"channel" around the carbon
granules and avoid filtration.
Water seeks the path of least resistance.
When it flows
through a bed of loose carbon granules, it can carve a
channel
where it can flow freely with little resistance. Water
flowing
through the
channel does not come in contact with the
filtration
medium. The water continues to flow,
however, so
you do not realize
that your filter has failed - you get water,
but it is not completely filtered.
Pockets of contaminated water can form in a loose bed of carbon
granules.
With changes in water pressure and flow rates,
these
pockets can collapse, "dumping"
the contaminated water
through the
filter into the "filtered" flow.
Since the carbon granules are fairly large (0.1mm to 1mm in one
popular
pitcher filter), the effective
pore size of the filter is relatively
large
(20 - 30
microns or larger). GAC filters, by themselves, can not
bacteria.
As described
above, hot
water should NEVER be run through a
carbon filter
Also, if you think of a bed of charcoal that traps an occasional
bacterium, picks up a bit of organic material, and
removes the chlorine
from the water, you can see how these
filters might become breeding
grounds
for the bacteria they trap. You will see warnings about GAC
filters suggesting
you run water through them for a few minutes each
morning to flush out any
bacteria. If you are considering purchasing a
GAC filter be sure to ask the
representative about what they
recommend you do about this potential
problem
(I was told by one
sales person, that if the filter was not going to be
used
for a few days,
I should remove the filtration element,
place it in a
plastic bag, and
store it in the refrigerator until I
returned).
Unless the filter
plugs up or you notice an odor in the "filtered water",
it may be difficult to know when the
filter has become saturated with
contaminants and ineffective.
That is why it is necessary to change
filter cartridges according to
the manufacturer's recommendation.
Solid Block Activated Carbon (SBAC):
Activated carbon is the primary raw material in solid
carbon block filters;
but instead of carbon granules comprising the filtration medium, the
carbon has been specially treated, compressed, and bonded to form
a
uniform matrix. The effective
pore size can be very small (0.5 - 1
micron). SBAC, like all filter cartridges, eventually
become plugged or
saturated by contaminants and must be changed
according to
manufacturer's specifications.
Depending on the manufacturer, the filters
can be designed to
better reduce specific contaminants like arsenic,
MTBE, etc. (an
example)
The advantages of SBAC filters include:
Provide a larger surface area for adsorption to take
place than Granular
Activated Carbon
(GAC) filters for better contaminant reduction.
Provide a longer
contact time with the activated carbon for more
complete contaminant reduction.
Provide a small pore size to physically
trap particulates. If the pore size
is small enough, around 0.5 micron or
smaller, bacteria that become
trapped in the pores do not have enough room
to multiply, eliminating a
problem common to GAC filters.
Completely eliminate the channeling and dumping problems
associated with GAC filters.
SBAC filters are useful in emergency situations where water pressure
and electricity might be lost.
They do not require electricity to be
completely effective, and
water can even be siphoned through them.
SBAC filters do not waste water like reverse osmosis.
Many dissolved minerals are not removed by activated carbon. In the
case of calcium,
magnesium, potassium, and other beneficial minerals,
the taste of the water can be
improved and some (usually small) nutrient
value can be
gained from the water.
Simple, economical maintenance. Typically an inexpensive filter
cartridge needs to be changed
every few months to a year, depending
on water use and the
manufacturer's recommendation.
This
combination of features provides the potential for greater adsorption
of many different chemicals (pesticides, herbicides, chlorine, chlorine
byproducts, etc.) and greater particulate filtration of parasitic cysts,
asbestos, etc. than many other purification process available. By using
other specialized materials along with specially
prepared activated carbon,
customized SBAC filters can be
produced for specific applications or to
achieve greater capacity ratings
for certain contaminants like lead,
mercury, arsenic, etc.
The disadvantages of SBAC filters
include:
SBAC filters, like all activated carbon filters, do not
naturally reduce the
levels of soluble salts (including
nitrates), fluoride, and some other
potentially harmful minerals
like arsenic (unless specially
designed) and
cadmium. If these contaminants are present in your water, reverse
osmosis would usually be the most economical alternative
followed by
distillation.
As described
above, hot
water should NEVER be run through a
carbon filter
As SBAC filters remove contaminants from the water they gradually
lose effectiveness until they are no
longer able to adsorb the
contaminants. There is no easy way to
determine when a filter
is
nearing the end of its effective life except that the 'filtered' water
eventually begins to taste
and smell like the
unfiltered water. The
manufacturer's guidelines for changing filter cartridges should always
be followed.
You might want to check NSF
International to see if the SBAC filtration system you are
interested in purchasing is certified.
An example of a certified list of
contaminants significantly reduced by a high-end SBAC filtration
system (** at 200 percent of capacity - that's after filtering
twice the rated volume of the filter**):
For Standard 042 -
aesthetic
Chlorine Reduction, Class I
(actual chlorine reduction 99.9%)
Particulate Reduction, Class I
(actual particulate reduction down to 0.5
micron)
Chloramine Reduction
(actual chloramine reduction greater than 96%)
Taste and Odor Reduction
For Standard 053 -
contaminants of health concern and measured percent reduction
Asbestos Reduction >99%
Chlordane Reduction >99.8%
Cyst Reduction 99.9%
Lead Reduction >98%
Mercury Reduction >99.3% (pH 8.5) >91.4 (pH
6.5)
MTBE Reduction 96.6%
PCB Reduction >98%
Toxaphene Reduction >93%
TTHM Reduction (Trihalomethanes) >99.8%
Turbidity Reduction >99%
VOC Reduction (volatile organic chemical) Reduction -
you will see a
long list of specific VOCs (individual percent
reduction for the various
VOCs can be found on the product certification sheet
below, but
most are 98-99% or more).
A few SBAC filtration systems
have been certified for arsenic reduction:
|
What about the inexpensive GAC pitcher filters and faucet
mount filters? What
will they do for your water purification needs?.
The answer to that question depends on what your water treatment goals
are and the
amount of filtered water you plan to use. The most
popular brands are GAC filters
that will sometimes also contain granules of an ion
exchange medium (you can see
and hear the granules rattling around).
They do reduce the level of some contaminants of health concern and thus
are
better than nothing.
They are very limited in the type and number of contaminants
they remove,
typically chlorine and perhaps
lead, copper, and/or cysts are reduced.
At about $5 - $10 for a filter cartridge capable of treating about 35 -
40 gallons,
your filtered water will cost about
$0.14 - $0.25 per gallon ( $58 - $90 per year if
you use 35 gallons per
month). If you are using (or would like to use) much more
than a gallon per day, and/or would
like to remove more than a minimum number of
contaminants, you should probably
examine other options.
Since they contain a very small amount of very loose GAC granules,
they CAN
NOT be considered effective
treatments for most biological contaminants
or chemical contaminants of
health concern. The pitcher filters which contain
a microfilter are typically
certified to reduce cysts. All of these filters are mostly
designed to improve the aesthetics
of drinking water (taste & odor improvement)
and reduce levels of a limited
number of harmful contaminants. They are subject to
possible bacterial growth channeling,
and all the other problems of larger GAC
filters.
How about the Solid Carbon Block faucet mount filters?
The solid carbon block faucet mount filters are more effective than GAC
filters in
reducing contaminants.
These
filters, by nature, are quite small, though, and because filter
effectiveness is
dependent on contact time of the
water with the filter media, a larger, high-quality
solid carbon block filter will be
more effective at reducing contaminants at the
same flow rate. The
difference is size can be striking - 4 ounces of activated
carbon for a faucet mount filter
vs. 32 ounces for a high-end filter, over 7 times
more filter media.
Like
the pitcher filters, the replacement cartridges for faucet mount filters
tend to
be relatively more expensive
(typically $0.14 - $0.25 per gallon) compared to a
high-quality solid block activated
carbon replacement filter which will filter water for
about $0.07 per gallon. Using
2 gallons of filtered water per day would cost
between $100 and $180 to replace
4-5 ounce faucet mount cartridges and about
$50 to replace a 32 ounce high-end
filter.
|
Bottled Water:
Did the water
in the bottle you just purchased really come from the beautiful spring shown on
the label? How can you be sure the water in the bottle is any cleaner or safer
than your tap water? How does the cost, both short term and long term, compare
with other water purification options?
Bottled water is simply water from some source
that a company (or in the case of water vending machines, the consumer)
has placed in a bottle for resale. Bottled water can have minimal
(or no) processing - as in natural spring or mineral water, or it can be
completely filtered and demineralized to nearly pure water and then have
minerals added back in to make it taste better.
But, how can you be sure the water
in the bottle you purchased is any cleaner or
safer than your tap water?
Just like with any of
the other water treatment solutions,
you will find reputable companies that
provide a safe, quality product, and you will
find companies that fill their
bottles using the local, municipal water. Each
company must be evaluated individually (A
Review of Bottled Water and a NRDC
Discussion of Bottled Water).
There are 2 regulatory organizations, 1 trade
association, and 1 independent certification
organization which contribute to
insuring the safety and quality of bottled water.
According to the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension
Service, bottled water is regulated at the federal level, and in some cases, at
the state level. Bottled water suppliers who are members of the International
Bottled Water Association (IBWA) regulate themselves and are given unannounced
inspections by NSF International. Bottled water companies can also
have their product certified by NSF International.
Federal standards - Bottled water is
regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which requires
manufacturers to submit samples regularly for testing. In the United States, the
concentration of contaminants found in bottled water must be less than the
"allowable levels" set by the FDA which are essentially the same as the maximum
contaminant levels that the EPA requires municipal water supplies to meet.
State standards - Individual states must enforce the federal bottled
water regulations, but they can also pass stricter standards.
International Bottled Water
Association. The bottled water industry regulates itself through the
International Bottled Water Association (IBWA). Bottled water FAQs. The
IBWA sets manufacturing requirements, which help to ensure that bottlers meet
FDA health standards. Bottled water producers who are members of IBWA are
inspected annually by an independent laboratory, the National Sanitation
Foundation. Through unannounced inspections, members are evaluated on compliance
with the IBWA's performance requirements and FDA Quality Standards. Not all
bottled water manufacturers are members of the IBWA. Of the 475 bottling plants
in the United States (in 1994), 250 are members. The label may indicate whether
a bottled water comes from a member company.
You might want to check NSF
International to see if the bottled water you are interested in
purchasing is certified. The NSF Bottled Water Certification Program is an annual, voluntary certification process that includes both extensive product evaluations as well as on-site audits of bottling facilities.
The NSF testing program provides for annual unannounced plant inspections covering every aspect of a bottler's operation, from the source of the water, through the disinfection and treatment process, and including the container closure process.
The company also performs extensive product testing for over 160 chemical, inorganic, radiological, and microbiological contaminants.
An interesting article from Scientific American magazine on bottled
water.
The advantages of Bottled Water include:
An
emergency source of water in the event your primary water source fails or
becomes contaminated.
A
convenient source of usually safe water for drinking outside of the home.
Bottled
water, since it does not contain chlorine, and may contain a mix of minerals
to enhance flavor, may taste
better than untreated tap water.
Most
bottled water will contain fewer contaminants than untreated tap water.
The bottled water industry would like the public to believe that bottled water is
more pure
and safer than tap water and
water produced by other treatment methods. The actual
quality
of bottled water depends on the bottling company, and
most is usually good.
High quality home
water treatment methods (filtration, reverse
osmosis, and distillation) can usually produce water
of equal
or better quality more economically, however.
The disadvantages of Bottled Water include:
Cost - Bottled water costs anywhere from
$0.25 a gallon for water from a vending
machine to $0.50 for generic water jugs you purchase in a store to $1.00 -
$1.50
or more for water delivered to your home.
If you purchase 10 gallons of
bottled water a week, you will spend $260 (at
$.50/gal), $520 (at $1.00/gal),
$780 (at $1.50/gal), or more every year.
Many of us are willing to
pay extraordinary prices for the availability and
convenience of of certain
products. That 16 ounce bottle of "designer water"
you just purchased at the gas
station for $0.69 costs $5.52 per gallon, probably
more than twice as much per gallon as your gas!
Purchasing one 16 oz bottle
per day (at $0.69 per bottle) will cost you
$248 per
year - that's for a total of 45
gallons.
If you
were to take a minute to fill your own well-cleaned bottle with filtered
or distilled water, however, a 16 oz bottle of water would
cost perhaps1 - 2 cents
a day, or less than $7.30 per
year!
Convenience - Using
bottled water requires moving and storing jugs or bottles of
water. Water weighs
about eight pounds per gallon, or about 40 pounds per five
gallon bottle. Failure of a small valve can lead to a big mess, as I discovered after
arriving
home one evening after a long day at work to find 3 gallons of water
soaking into the
rug.
Environmental Impact -
Producing bottles uses resources, and unless they are
reused or recycled, they
cause a waste disposal problem. Recycle or reuse the
empty bottles, if at all possible. Transporting
bottles of water from the bottler to
stores or homes also uses resources.
Keep it Clean - According to the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension
Service, "If you choose bottled water after careful investigation, keep in
mind that all of
your hard work will go to waste if you aren't careful about
keeping your bottled
water clean. You have to be faithful in maintaining the
hygiene of your bottled
water, or you may increase your exposure to bacteria.
Bacteria grow best in
warm, moist areas. The wet, warm, threaded cap of an
unrefrigerated bottle of
water is a perfect place for bacteria to grow; they
will begin to grow as soon as
you break the seal. If ingested, these bacteria
can cause gastrointestinal
problems and other health risks. The key is to
maintain the cleanliness of your
bottles and store them properly. Follow these
hints:
1) Store the bottle in a refrigerator at a temperature above freezing but
less than
50 degrees Fahrenheit.
2) Wipe the seal with a clean cloth after each
use.
3) Avoid any type of buildup in the bottle cap.
4) If your bottle is
refillable, make sure it is well-cleaned and rinsed before
refilling.
If
possible, recycle the old bottle and obtain a fresh, sterile, sealed
bottle."
5 gallon water dispensers
must also be kept meticulously clean to prevent
bacteria from growing in the
reservoir area and bubbling into the bottle. Safety &
Health Services cleaning
recommendations. (pdf file)
|

Ultra Violet Light:
Water passes
through a clear chamber where it is exposed to Ultra Violet (UV) Light. UV light
effectively destroys bacteria and viruses. However, how well the
UV system works depends on the energy dose that the organism absorbs.
If
the energy dose is not high enough, the organism’s genetic material
may only be damaged rather than disrupted.
The advantages of using UV include:
No known toxic or significant nontoxic byproducts introduced
Removes some organic contaminants
Leaves no smell or taste in the treated water
Requires very little contact time (seconds versus minutes for chemical
disinfection)
Improves the taste of water because some organic contaminants and nuisance
microorganisms are destroyed
Many pathogenic microorganisms are killed or rendered inactive.
Does not affect minerals in water
The disadvantages of using UV include:
UV
radiation is not suitable for water with high levels of suspended solids, turbidity,
color, or soluble
organic matter. These materials can react with UV radiation, and
reduce disinfection performance. Turbidity makes it
difficult for radiation to
penetrate water and pathogens can be 'shadowed',
protecting them from the light.
UV light is not effective against any non-living
contaminant, lead, asbestos, many
organic chemicals, chlorine, etc.
Tough cryptosporidia cysts
are fairly resistant to UV light.
| |