|
To return to previous page, close this window Home
Page
Populations Most at Risk From Drinking Water
Contaminants
To better understand how the health risks of water
contaminants are determined,
I would encourage you to read this discussion.
|
Risks
to Pregnancy*:
Disinfection Byproducts - (read the new
information below about this topic)
A 1998 Federal Register report, National
Primary Drinking Water Regulations.
Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts
Notice of Data Availability, listed several studies suggested
pregnant women who drank water containing the disinfection byproducts,
Trihalomethanes (THM) could increase the risk of neural tube defects in the
developing fetus or early term miscarriage. Another study providing
similar information can be found at Water chlorination and birth
defects.
Neural tube defects
- "The authors reported elevated odds ratios (ORs),
generally between 1.5 and
2.1, for the association of neural tube defects with
trihalomethanes (THMs). However, the only
statistically significant results were seen when the
analysis was isolated to those subjects with the
highest THM exposures (greater
than 40 parts per billion {or ppb}) and limited to those subjects with
neural
tube defects in which there were no other malformations (odds ratio = 2.1,
meaning that the
risk was about double what it would have been without exposure to
THMs)." Several recent
papers have supported the 1998 findings:
Dodds L, King WD., Relation between trihalomethane
compounds and birth defect,
in Occup Environ Med 2001 Jul;58(7):443-6; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. et. al.,
Chlorination disinfection byproducts in water and their association with adverse reproductive
outcomes: a review, in Occup Environ Med 2000
Feb;57(2):73-85; Klotz
JB, Pyrch LA., Neural tube
defects and drinking water disinfection by-products,
in Epidemiology 1999 Jul;10(4):383-90
Miscarriages
- "Women with high THM exposure in home tap water
(drinking five or more glasses
per day of cold home tap water containing at
least 75 micro gram (ug) per liter of THM) had an early
term miscarriage rate of 15.7%,
compared with a rate of 9.5% among women with low THM exposure
(drinking less
than 5 glasses per day of cold home tap water or drinking any amount of tap
water
containing less than 75 ug per liter of THM - {or 75 parts ppb})."
It is worth mentioning that the current EPA Maximum
Contaminant Level (MCL) for total
THMs is 80ug/l (or ppb).
A link to Some
medical abstracts concerning pregnancy and disinfection byproducts
The information above will be retained until several other studies confirm
the results published 9-06.
Do not drink water
that has not been disinfected or cut back your water intake in an effort to
reduce THM
or other contaminant exposure.
Based on the current state of knowledge, any
potential risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with drinking
water containing THMs are
far lower than the risks of serious illness and
death that could result from consuming drinking water
that has not been
properly disinfected. If you want to reduce exposure to THMs
consider drinking
bottled water from a NSF certified company or purchasing
a treatment system (discussed elsewhere)
that is certified by NSF to
remove THMs.
New
information 9/9/2006 - According to a study in the November issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology (available online September 5), a team of researchers at the University of North Carolina School of Public Health headed by David A. Savitz, Ph.D., Director of the Center of Excellence in Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Disease Prevention at MSSM, and formerly Chair of the Department of Epidemiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, have determined that drinking water DBPs -- in the range commonly encountered in the US -- do not affect fetal survival. This finding is particularly important because previous research has suggested that exposure to elevated levels of drinking water DBPs might cause pregnancy loss.
There are ongoing
studies that implicate a variety of other drinking water contaminants as
possibly causing problems with pregnancy or the developing fetus:
Arsenic
- May cause low birth weights, spontaneous abortions, and other problems. Another
discussion
on arsenic and pregnancy can be found by clicking
here,
Nitrates
- Exposure during pregnancy is possibly linked to neural tube defects, although
the study did
not rule out other causes.
Other organic compounds like Dioxin have also been implicated as having harmful effects on the
developing fetus. another
article, Dioxin
fact sheet
Lead
- Discussed in detail here.
|
Risks
to Children*:
National Resources Defense Council - Our Children At Risk
EPA - Children’s Environmental Health,
Children and Drinking Water Standards,
Contaminants to Which Children May Be Particularly Sensitive
Several contaminants are of particular concern to children:
Lead
- Discussed in detail here.
Nitrates
- A common pollutant in water in the Midwest or other
agricultural regions. High levels of nitrites
or nitrates in the water
supply can interfere with infants' ability to absorb oxygen and can lead to
"blue-baby" syndrome (methemoglobinemia), which can result in death.
EPA has set drinking water
standards for nitrates and nitrites.
Pesticides
- Malignancies {in
children} linked to pesticides in case reports or case-control studies
include
leukemia, neuroblastoma, Wilms' tumor, soft-tissue sarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma,
non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma, and cancers of the brain, colorectum, and testes.
Although these studies have been limited
by nonspecific pesticide exposure
information, small numbers of exposed subjects, and the potential for
case-response bias, it is noteworthy that many of the reported increased risks
are of greater magnitude
than those observed in studies of pesticide-exposed
adults, suggesting that children may be particularly
sensitive to the
carcinogenic effects of pesticides.
Zahm SH, Ward MH., Pesticides and childhood
cancer, in Environ Health, in Perspect 1998 Jun;106
Suppl 3:893-908.
A
related article, Cancer Risk and Parental Pesticide Application in Children
of Agricultural...
Biological Contaminants
- E. coli, giardia and
cryptosporidia cysts can all cause gastro-intestinal
problems where dehydration
from diarrhea and vomiting may be more severe and rapid than in adults.
These contaminants can cause death.
In 1998, EPA established the Interim
Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule, which strengthens control over microbial
contaminants, including the pathogen,
Cryptosporidium. By 2002, public water
systems using surface water (or ground water under the direct
influence of
surface water) and serving more than 10,000 peopl must comply with the rule.
States must
adopt the new standards by 2001. In some people, particularly
children under 5 years of age and the
elderly, E. coli 0157:H7 infection can
also cause a complication called hemolytic uremic syndrome, in
which the red
blood cells are destroyed and the kidneys fail. About 2% of infections lead to
this
complication.
Disinfection Byproducts (DBPs)
- According to
the EPA, the risk varies depending on the DBP.
Some epidemiological studies may indicate a link between certain DBPs and a
slight increased risk of
reproductive and developmental effects.
It would make sense that if drinking water contaminated with
moderate levels of DBPs over a lifetime
increases the risk of some
cancers, it would be an excellent idea to remove as many of these
compounds from the drinking water as soon in life as possible and
continue the removal through
adulthood.
For additional information on the special sensitivity of children
to drinking water contaminants, visit the
EPA's excellent site: Children
and Drinking Water Standards.
|
Risks
to the Elderly and/or Immunocompromised*:
Although both populations are affected by all of the
contaminants listed above, they are at special risk of
serious injury or death
from biological, pathogenic contaminants. If there is any chance that
their drinking
water has been contaminated with harmful bacteria, or cysts,
their drinking water should be disinfected
immediately (boiling would be a good
option), or they should drink a
good quality of bottled water until
the water is safe. Since it can take
as long as 24 hours to be notified of a contaminant risk,
a better plan
than continually wondering if the water were safe would be
to invest in a high quality filtration system that
is NSF certified to
remove cysts. The PDF file, Protecting
Vulnerable People from Drinking Water
Diseases and Illnesses, from the
Campaign for Safe and Affordable Drinking Water (CSADW), containg
some good
information about these risks.
In some people, particularly children under 5 years of age
and the elderly, E. coli 0157:H7 infection can
also cause a complication called
hemolytic uremic syndrome, in which the red blood cells are destroyed
and the
kidneys fail. |
Water
Treatment Strategies for High Risk Groups*
If there are members of these high-risk groups
living in your home, it would be an excellent plan to
consider a permanent water
treatment strategy , since:
There is always a "lag
time" between the discovery of pathogens in a water supply by water
officials and
notification of the public.
There are disinfection byproducts at some level in
nearly all water that is chlorinated. The highest
levels are usually found in chlorinated water (municipal or private) from a surface source or water from
an
unconfined aquifer. Water from confined aquifers typically does
not have to be chlorinated as heavily
(if at all) as water from the
other sources. This water also usually contains a lower level of
the organic
material (leaf fragments, etc.) that interacts with chlorine
to form the disinfection byproducts than does
surface water or water
from an unconfined aquifer.
A high percentage of homes have the potential for lead
to leach into the drinking water from the
plumbing pipes and fixtures -
this problem is discussed in detail on the previous page.
In agricultural regions, there is a good reason to expect nitrate,
pesticide, and possibly bacterial
contamination, particularly in private wells using water from unconfined aquifers (or
in surface water).
Surface water is also likely to contain cryptosporidia
or giardia cysts. Wells in these regions should
be tested,
and water quality reports should be studied carefully to see if these
contaminants exist in the
drinking water.
The simplest and most economical
long- term solution to reduce the majority of the above
contaminants (except nitrates) and chronic
bacterial or viral contamination to safe
levels is
a NSF certified, high-quality, Solid
Block, Activated Carbon (SBAC) filtration system with a
sub-micron pore size.
- These
systems will significantly reduce the chlorine, any DBPs, cysts, asbestos, and a wide range
of pesticides and
other organic contaminants from your drinking and cooking water.
Most SBAC
filtration systems also remove lead effectively, and
some are designed to remove mercury, but check
with the manufacturer to make certain.
- Although these filters are not recommended for continual use with
bacterially contaminated water, the
pore size is small enough to reduce the
levels of many types of bacteria that might accidentally
contaminate
a normally safe water supply.
- NSF does
not certify filtration systems for bacterial removal, so make certain
that the manufacturer of
any SBAC system you are considering
provides independent lab tests that demonstrate effective
reduction of E.
Coli.
If nitrates
or arsenic are known (or
suspected) to be in the water, in addition to the other contaminants
listed above, a high-quality, Reverse
Osmosis (RO) system would be the most economical
long-term
solution. Any system you purchase should have a good
activated carbon solid block post-filtration
system to remove any contaminants not removed by the RO
membranes.
Distillation
is also an excellent method treating water that has contaminants not
removed by activated
carbon, but it is more expensive than reverse osmosis.
UV disinfection
could be used with activated carbon filtration or reverse osmosis
to provide
additional protection for water that
contained harmful bacteria, viruses, or other pathogens.
|
It
is possible, though thankfully rare, for harmful bacteria or
other pathogens to find their way into
drinking water from a
municipal water source or private well. If these organisms are in the water illness
can occur.
If tap water is regularly suspected to contain harmful pathogens, there are several
point of
use treatment options that can be considered for home drinking
water if on a municipal water system.
distillation
ozone treatment
solid block activated carbon or reverse
osmosis filtration (to reduce non-living contaminants and
turbidity) followed by UV
treatment to kill the pathogens.
Distillation and ozone are probably
more expensive options than filtration and UV
treatment.
If on a well, point of entry
disinfection might be the most economical solution for bacterial
or viral contamination.
Bottled water is a good emergency
source of safe drinking water, but often, by the time a problem
has been discovered and an emergency boil order has been issued,
many people have already been exposed to the contaminated
water. A better solution when you suspect municipal water
(or well water for that matter) is or may become unsafe, is to
install and maintain a permanent treatment system for all water
consumed in the home (including tooth brushing).
Individual-size bottles can then be carefully cleaned and filled
with the treated water to drink away from the home. |
| *
Please be advised that the information on this page and on this
site is for general educational information only and is NOT
intended to make any specific health claims or recommend any
specific treatment method or preventative advice for any health
issue or problem. Consult your physician or a health
specialist for specific steps to take for your specific health
requirements! |
|